points
- if uu settled on a particular approach to ethics, it would conflict with some or all of the faith traditions that people bring when they join
- even within an established tradition, there can be differences in meta-ethics
- using values is a good way to eas into ethics, but it is not nearly as comprehensive as any of the traditions that it accomodates
- we want to be as inclusive as possible so we seem to avoid looking for irreconcilable differences while concentrating on similarities
-
values:
- interdependence
- pluralism
- justice
- transformation
- generosity
- equity
- UU loves to declare moral mandates on things that the political left has adopted as parts of identity, but declaring a mandate requires that you spell out your ethical foundations